Many applications require a repetitive source of high voltage pulses
having fast rise and fall times. These applications include drivers for
piezo-electric devices, ion tubes, gas tubes, liquid polarizing cells,
beam steering applications, the generation of electric fields in aqueous
solutions, and time-of-flight mass spectrometry measurements.
A high voltage pulse generator consists, essentially, of a high voltage
power supply and a high voltage switch capable of alternately connecting
and disconnecting this voltage source to a load. A simplified pulse
generator is shown below. Here the high voltage supply charges a
reservoir capacitor while the high voltage switch (HVS) is open. When
HVS is closed, this reservoir capacitor rapidly supplies a pulse of
current to charge the various capacitances (consisting of internal,
cable, and load capacitances, as shown) to the full pulse amplitude and
then, with the help of the power supply, supplies a steady current as
determined by the load resistance to maintain this amplitude until HVS
is again opened.
High Voltage Pulse Generators in a Circuit |
Although a high voltage pulse is the desired waveform, it is important
to consider the current waveform required to produce this voltage pulse
because it is this current waveform that sets important requirements on
both the power supply and the high voltage switch. Current through the
high voltage switch is a function of the sum of all internal, cable, and
load capacitances and the load resistance. All three capacitances and
the load resistance also have a significant impact on the rise and fall
times of the pulse. A common problem with many users is in failing to
consider these effects when specifying pulse operating requirements.
Let’s consider a typical current waveform in more detail.
Component of Current Pulse |
This current waveform consists of two parts: an initial sharp pulse and
then a steady component. The sharp pulse of current, which determines
the voltage pulse 10% to 90% rise time, has an average value as given by
the following equation, where dV is the change in pulse amplitude
during the rise time and dT is the rise time. As a rule of thumb, the
peak current during the rise time is 2 to 3 times this average value.
Iaverage-rise = [Cinternal + Ccable + Cload] dV/dT
The surrent required to maintain the pulse amplitude across the load resistor is as follows, where R is the value of the load.
Iflat top = Pulse Amplitude / R
The 90% to 10% pulse fall time is given by the following equation:
Fall Time = 2.2 R [Cinternal + Ccable + Cload]
Consider this typical application. A 3.2 kV pulse generator with a 1 ns
rise time and 12 pF of internal stray capacitance is connected to a
Pockels Cell having a capacitance of 1 pF and a resistance of 10 M ohms
via a 2-foot length of RG 114, 185 ohm coaxial cable. This cable has a
capacitance of 6.5pF per foot when not terminated in its characteristic
impedance. The values give:
Iaverage-rise = [12 pf +13 pf +1 pf] [3,200 volts / 1 ns] = 83.2 amps
Ipeak-rise ~ 160 amps
Iflat top = [3,200 volts / 10 M ohms] = 320 µa
Fall Time = 2.2[10 M ohms] [12 pf + 13 pf + 1 pf] = 572 µs
Therefore, to drive a 1 pF Pockels Cell, through 2 feet of 185 ohm
cable, from 0 to 3.2 kV in 1 ns requires a peak current of approximately
160 A. The fall time is slow because the various capacitors are
discharged through the 10 M ohms resistor when the high voltage switch
is opened. The fall time may be made faster by using a shunt resistor
across the cell terminals.
As an example, consider what happens when the cable is terminated in its
characteristic impedance by adding a 185 ohm shunt resistor across the
load. This reduces the current required during the pulse rise time dT by
effectively eliminating the cable capacitance, increases the current
required from the power suppluy to maintain the pulse amplitude, and
reduces the pulse fall time.
Iaverage-rise = [12 pf +1 pf] [3,200 volts / 1 ns] = 41.6 amps
Ipeak-rise ~ 80 amps
Iflat top = [3,200 volts / 185 ohms] = 17 amps
Fall Time = 2.2[185 ohms] [12 pf + 1 pf] = 5.3 ns
Another technique that can be used to reduce the pulse fall time and
minimize the effects of load and cable capacitance is to add another
high voltage switch from the load to ground. When the first HVS is
turned off this HVS is turned on, effectively discharging the load
capacitance to ground, or “biting the tail” of the pulse. This generally
results in a fall time that is less dependent on the load capacitance
and resistance. The average pulse current is also decreased since a
shunt resistor across the load is no longer required. The addition of
the second switch increases the cost of the pulse generator and, in most
cases, has a minimal effect on the rise time.
The HV Pulse 5k-2500 is an example of a pulse generator that utilizes a
tail biter to control pulse fall time. This pulser is designed to drive
the grid of a high power vacuum tube, which presents a large load
capacitance. Assume a pulse amplitude 0-5 kV and a load that looks like
250 ohms in parallel with a total of 1450 pF. The design goal is to keep
the pulse fall time below 200 ns. With no tail biter, the approximate
fall time would be:
Fall Time = 2.2[250 ohms] [100 pf + 1450 pf] = 853 ns
When a tail biter consisting of a current-limiting resistor of 70 ohms
in series with a second HVS is introduced across the load, the fall time
is reduced to:
Fall Time = 2.2[250 ohms || 70 ohms] [100 pf + 1450 pf] = 187 ns
It is apparent that load capacitance, including cable capacitance, is a
very important consideration in the design and application of high
voltage pulsers. Depending on operating requirements, the effects of
capacitance can be controlled in several ways: the length of the
interconnecting cable can be made as short as possible, a shunt resistor
can be added across the load, or a tail biter can be introduced into
the circuit.
Hello, an amazing Information dude. Thanks for sharing this nice information with us. covid-19 cleaning services Elkins Park
ReplyDelete